Posts con #codingFail

#codingFail

Posts públicos de X que usan #codingFail.

Hashtags relacionados

  1. Robert Haase@haesleinhuepf
    Me: Good news or bad news? Them: Good! Me: I parallelized your code as promised. Them: Awesome. What's the bad? Me: While translating your code we found a bug in the original. It turns out it did nonsense. Me: Oh and the new code is 200x faster... doing nonsense. 😁 #CodingFail
    Mike Croucher is on BlueSky @walkingrandomly
    Me: Good news or bad news? Them: Good! Me: I parallelized your code as promised. Them: Awesome. What's the bad? Me: The new algorithm is hella slow. You're going to need 16 cores to match the old serial performance. Me: Oh and scaling above 16 cores sucks! #CodingFail
    1016
  2. Mike Croucher is on BlueSky@walkingrandomly
    Me: Good news or bad news? Them: Good! Me: I parallelized your code as promised. Them: Awesome. What's the bad? Me: The new algorithm is hella slow. You're going to need 16 cores to match the old serial performance. Me: Oh and scaling above 16 cores sucks! #CodingFail
    3027
  3. Dave Jones✓@eevblog
    I'm pretty sure that 30,348 is not the the "upper end" of 19,200-30,000 #CodingFAIL Should be: if (Views>UpperBound) then PrintPraiseText
    Descargar
    609
  4. Stokry✓@stokry_45
    Code with: for (int i = 0; i << num; i++) // off-by-one hell Spotted this in prod. Who's debugging my life? 😅 #CodingFail #WebDev #Oops
    01212
  5. Sam Harrison@samharrison7
    When you write a bash script to create config files for the years 2000 to 2020 and accidentally write 2020 as 20200. I thought it was taking a while to complete... #codingfail
    Descargar
    008
  6. Chris Stantis, PhD@ChrisStantis
    Me: "I write my variables in CamelHumper" Husband: "...do you mean CamelCase? Tell me you mean CamelCase." #CodingFail #RStats
    018
  7. ⌬Nessa Carson@SuperScienceGrl
    Wow! I ran my script in minus 360 seconds apparently. If I keep going, I'll be 21 again. #codingFail!
    106
  8. JC@JC_SoCal
    Today's #CodingFail moment is spending 20 minutes wondering why your records counts are off by one and then finally realizing you're not taking into account the CSV header ... it'll get you every time!
    007
  9. Mostrar más posts