BlockedByRinna

Uncle Tom @TommyLaRussoLLC

Aged like milk 😭😭😭

AION @BEmpress1984

@Vancouverchicc I think she disclosed why she came on the scene. So she can muddy the waters. So people don't listen anymore to certain podcasters.

Stew Peters @realstewpeters

Shawn Ryan’s editor did in fact quit his job because @leahfiles was muzzled to protect @ShawnRyan762’s investments and ties to the Israeli surveillance state.

Travis @NihiloX

@dailyfreddo is sharp. Her YouTube video is blowing my mind right now.

Candace Owens @RealCandaceO

🚨Carrie Prejean Boller just asked Seth Dillon, while he was under oath, about the infamous Hamptons meeting with Charlie Kirk. And now his story has shifted. He now admits that there was a “HEATED and at times spirited debate”. But Seth denied that, categorically, when we first reported on this summit. Go back and read Seth’s tweet on September 16th. He said there was “no angry confrontation” in the Hamptons. He presented the Hamptons weekend as a perfectly enjoyable summer retreat. Seth Dillon, like Josh Hammer, LIED in the immediate aftermath of Charlie’s death to cover his own contribution to the pressure Charlie was under regarding his shifting positions on Israel. As I always said CHARLIE WAS PRESSED BY SETH DILLON AND YES—IT WAS HEATED. Charlie left the Hamptons and described it as an intervention. He then vented to Megyn Kelly about what he was experiencing, at the hands of his “friends”. Way to go, @CarriePrejean1!

Travis @NihiloX

@realstewpeters accuses Candace Owens of protecting Israel, while simultaneously claiming that the reason “she wouldn’t have him on her show” is because of “how in-depth and detailed” his analysis on Israel is.

Heather @Taskf0rce2022

@michelle_ogno @baroncoleman I love timelines. Timelines Trump feels. @AnaEscobarShow did all of us a favor, when she created this one, below. Just pause to read, in this short clip. @leahfiles @realstewpeters

Travis @NihiloX

It's worth noting that the person now trying to discredit Candace Owens is deeply, deeply, tied to the intelligence world. Take her uncle by marriage for example. After 32 years in intelligence, his resume is impressive. (With Obama, far left, both photos) ▪️NSA He started as a signals intelligence analyst in 1983 and rose to Chief of Staff to the Foreign Affairs Director, overseeing NSA's foreign relations and more than 50 international partnerships. ▪️ODNI He was Chief of Staff to Michael Hayden, the first Principal Deputy Director of National Intelligence, and helped build the new office's structure, policies, and procedures under George W. Bush. ▪️CIA He was Chief of Staff to CIA Director Michael Hayden, Chief for Policy and Coordination under Leon Panetta, and advised John Brennan on privacy and civil liberties oversight. Six directors and two acting directors in all. ▪️White House Situation Room He ran the President's 24/7 operations and intelligence center under Obama, started cyber monitoring there, and received the National Security Staff Medallion. ▪️Today He's Executive Director of the Michael V. Hayden Center at George Mason University and runs his own consulting firm. Clients have included NextFed and The Chertoff Group, where he was a managing director. Her father-in-law, by her own account, was a Booz Allen executive who oversaw its contracts with an entire branch of the military. And that's before her own long career inside the intelligence community and military industrial complex, that she still contracts within. I'm not assigning motive. But when someone with that background, and those family ties, suddenly comes onto the scene and goes after Candace, you should know it.

Candace Owens @RealCandaceO

I have not deleted a single post. Again, your pithy research is wrong. If it needs reminding, I made one public and TRUE statement on X that I was not prohibited from speaking about any topic on Shawn Ryan’s show— including Peter Thiel, who we discussed. My episode aired the week before you went on his show. I made no further public comment nor would I have ever addressed you publicly had you not decided to publicly drag me, question a simply ad read, and refer to me as a shill because you could not comprehend the *private* feedback I gave you on the substack you shared with me. You should be calling NO ONE a shill. Your entire background is manufactured (contract work for the NSA and CIA, finance and accounting and now a tech expert but never heard of a liability clause or the petrodollar? K.) It is obvious that you are producing AI-generated substacks based on publicly available information. Nothing you present is new or breaking and for those of us who have spent an entire year working on just ONE story, watching you pop in as a chaos agent to sow unnecessary drama is an annoying deviation. I’m responding to you because you are now annoying me. You are not a victim of some deep state attack because you managed to google “who owns flock” and had a bad interview with someone who saw through your bullshit. As a bonus, here is the full context of our correspondence which you read aloud at 3am in the morning in a random x space. This is the correspondence that led to your determination that I was a shill. I apologize for not writing you a 2am dissertation on why your article made no sense. Will state again you are FREE to publish the entire conversation because I have nothing to hide.

John Mappin @JohnMappin

Which truth seekers deserve support? And what is the best way to support them? Please comment below.

Raven Grace Op #22 of 92 🐦‍⬛✝️🍿🇺🇸 @RavenGraceGtr

BS this is all an act. She doesn’t know her sponsors? Give me a break. Baron you’re running cover for her. And he says he doesn’t even know if he has to do ad reads? They haven’t gone over the format of her show and what is expected. Does he think we are stupid? This is such a cluster F. He’s lying.