@darkst
Allergic to asininity. A bad, bad man.
Ken Klippenstein @kenklippensteinlmao
Denise Ward @DeniseEllen7Mr Imane Khelif will once again be punching a woman in the head in a boxing ring on December 15. He gets to do this because as a professional boxer he is eligible to compete against women in many countries. He was never accused of being transgender, he's a man, that's it.
Jo Bartosch @jo_bartoschI’ve been saying this for years, as have others, but now the boys in blue are maybe people might catch on…
ophie 💕🫧🦋 @opheliamodingBut my biological sex isn’t “male”. Like I know that’s something super hard to get through to voters or whatever but it is actually true and it does have implications on my rights!
Dilan Esper @dilanesperTBC about my position, if I could magically get Americans to stop caring that a 16 year old trans girl wins some minor track meet I would. I don't think that's worth worrying about. it's only at elite levels where you have to care. but the public disagrees with me.
Jo Bartosch @jo_bartoschHere’s a sample of the scum currently on my TL complaining that not being allowed to masturbate over footage of women being abused is an infringement of ‘free speech.’ They make the case for me.
jamiezerofour @jamiezerofour@darkst Freedom of expression, to produce and consume, is more the point here than freedom of speech. Obviously I don't believe in unlimited freedom of expression, but the idea that a married couple could have legal sex and be prosecuted for filming it and saving the footage is nuts.
Wesley Yang @wesyangQuestion to followers who used to believe transgender ideology was real -- when did you realize it was all fake?
Cerebral Vigilante @DelisketoMovie Night
KPSS Woman who said NO @MaybeIDisagree@darkst @jo_bartosch A completely reasonable response. There is something very wrong with men like you. A woman dared to disagree with you about the legality of strangling people and this is your response? I've met plenty of men like you. Never a pleasure.
Macrophysiological System🐀 @InVitroFutureI know it doesn't solve the core conflict, but just descriptively like 98% of the trans youth sports debate is solved by letting everyone participate freely, while making "eligible for official recordkeeping in the competitive women's division" a moderately onerous opt-in status
Rosie Duffield MP @RosieDuffield1I want you all to know this. There are 650 MPs in Parliament. Yet the one MP chosen by @UKLabour to Chair the Bill Committee for the controversial, dangerous and dismally bad draft legislation, the Conversion Practices Bill, is Alex Barros-Curtis. Until July 2024, when Alex was given a very safe Labour seat in Cardiff, he was the Head of the Labour Party's Governance and Legal Unit in London. This was a department set up to investigate complaints against members of the Labour Party. Complaints of antisemitism, Islamophobia, abuse, and of course latterly, mostly women holding legally-protected 'Gender Critical' (sex realist) beliefs. Alex oversaw the investigation of hundreds of members who liked or tweeted gender critical or feminist views. I was one of them. He investigated me, as a sitting Labour MP, for 13 months. 13 months to 'investigate' one like of one tweet. I had a great lawyer, one of the names we're all now familiar with, and I had to crowdfund to pay for his (excellent) work. They first tried in 2020. But the screenshots crudely attached to that passive aggressive, threatening-sounding email from LP admin staff were so risible that I replied that it was too ridiculous for me to waste my precious time on. They left it. Years of Starmer bumbling and stuttering through interviews about whether he had spoken to me, whether he supported me, etc followed. My feminist sins continued apace. And then I 'liked' a tweet by my GC comedian friend @Glinner. He had mocked Eddie'Suzy' for comparing his choice to wear traditional women's clothing, fake plastic breasts and nails, to those being persecuted by the Nazis during WWII. I found his sarcasm, as a award-winning comedy writer in the face of such offensive narcissism amusing and so 'liked' it. I found it absurd and obscene that Izzard, an extremely privileged and wealthy man, who openly changed his 'gender' at will, should write himself into history falseley as someone who would have been oppressed due to a circumstance beyond his control. We all know the groups who were tortured, starved and killed... There is obviously more to my story, I will tell it all, it's just one chapter of the years of spiteful abusive and bullying practices meted out to me by the Labour Party managers. Not those who'd achieved office on merit, or even unexpectedly, but those in the club, often having failed to be elected themselves. So Barros-Curtis who we were repeatedly told led 'the many *independent* inquiries into women members and MPs like me, now often stands as a trans-rights activist on the Labour backbenches. He has also been gifted the role of Chair of this Committee and is a huge supporter of this Bill. And I am not a part of the Bill Committee, although plenty of TRA MPs are. Does that sound like the democratic scrutiny of legislation to you?
KPSS Woman who said NO @MaybeIDisagreeI would LOVE to be Jo's sock, very flattering. Unfortunately, I do not possess her writing ability, or wit. My point stands. You are so bent out of shape that depictions of strangulation will no longer be available for you to pleasure yourself with, that you are pursuing women on X for simply advocating against it. Using their free speech, which infuriates you so much that you seek to bully them on to silence.
Marco Young @darkst@jo_bartosch You actually have a point there-a stupid one that proves you wrong. What they're banning is the *depiction* of the act in a recording. They're prohibiting the media container, not the practice. The *media itself* is the speech in question. Hope that helps
