Daniel Ives
RT @teleodaniel: Twenty years ago, @DeryaTR_ predicted we would reverse aging by 2045. People thought he was crazy.
Now, he thinks he was too conservative, and has moved the date up to 2040 because AGI arrived earlier than he expected.
I sat down with Derya to ask if such bold predictions are too fatalistic. Is the future guaranteed? Shall we just sit back and wait for AI to save us? Derya disagreed.
The golden age for humanity is within our sights, but there is much work to be done.
Academia is failing us. If it doesn’t adapt to the pace of progress AI enables, we have no shot at curing aging this century. And we need to invest trillions into collecting the data that superintelligence will need to solve biology.
If we pull it off, the future can be brighter than anyone imagines.
Watch the full episode below, or look up Free Radicals (@FreeRadicalsBio) on your favorite podcasting platform.
Special thank you to @adamgries and for hosting us at @VitalistBay!
Intro
AGI arrived early, accelerating the timeline to biosingularity
Are we really in the takeoff now?
Superintelligence can help us build a world model of biology
Aging as the breakdown of biological resilience
The case for investing trillions into biological data
The economic return on curing aging
AI is accelerating science but academics are stuck in the past
How AI can liberate humanity from biological constraints
Derya’s Human 2.0 dream
Testing the latest OpenAI models and rethinking the PhD
Agency, jobs, and free will in an AI world
Science fiction & Derya’s case for a coming golden age
02207


