Posts with #Bootstrap

#Bootstrap

Public posts on X that use #Bootstrap.

Related hashtags

  1. Piers Morgan✓@piersmorgan
    RIP Sir Patrick Stewart, 86. Wonderful actor, an amusing and intelligent character, and a Yorkshireman to his bootstraps. Persuaded me to switch from PG Tips tea to Yorkshire Gold, for which I will be forever grateful. ‘Strong and flavourful,’ he told me over breakfast. Like the man himself.
    Download
    15745110.6K220K
  2. ‏Tools➍Cydia✓@tools4cydia
    اداة Teleport maps خليته ف سورس تغير موقعك بسهوله من داخل اداة ولا تنسى اي تطبيق تغير موقعك لازم تفعل زر من ستراب سورس 🔋 #bootstrap #sileo #repo
    Download
    121415722.2K
  3. Michael Pyrcz🌻✓@GeostatsGuy
    I’m a big fan of the #statistical #bootstrap (Efron, 1979). This technique, which involves resampling to create new sample realizations, is incredibly powerful for #statistics and #MachineLearning. I teach it to all my students, emphasizing both its strengths and its many limitations. I have my students perform resampling from my cowboy hat in class and then I introduce my interactive #Python @matplotlib dashboard on #GitHub @ ∀. #DataScience
    Download
    28247457.5K
  4. Django@djangoproject
    Did you know that the #Django admin can be themed?! 🤯 Here are 10 packages for the Django admin which can transform it with a Dracula theme, #Bootstrap #CSS, #Tailwind, and more! Jazz up your Django admin today! 🎷
    75831716.2K
  5. Alv'extu@festusadetoye
    Imagine being able to adjust your font size across different screen sizes without writing a single media query 😂 Sounds weird, right? Apparently, you can use clamp() for that. 🧵
    Download
    1008
  6. Alv'extu@festusadetoye
    @festusadetoye
    Basically, the minimum value works for smaller screens, the preferred value (usually involving vw) lets the font size scale with the viewport, while the maximum value does exactly what its name says. 😂
    1003
  7. Anna McDougall@AnnaJMcDougall
    Today I finished the burger page for my course: #Bootstrap with some custom #Sass styling. Total work time about 4 hours. 45mins of that was just finding a missing script (derp). Really happy considering I learned Bootstrap and Sass within the last 7 days! 🥳 #100DaysofCode
    Download
    88118
  8. Matthew Yglesias✓@mattyglesias
    Jean-Luc Picard remains the single most compelling vision of progressive politics I am familiar with — secular, rational, compassionate, egalitarian; a believer in progress & abundance but also duty, hard work, and a constant battle for self-improvement and improving the world.
    Download
    3426885.8K187K
  9. yungmulababy✓@yungmulababylol
    @mattyglesias
    Duty, hard work, and self-improvement get strong pushback from contemporary progressives. A lot of progressives treat that kind of talk as the same old “pull yourself up by your bootstraps” line; something that puts the focus on what individuals should do while downplaying bigger structural problems. It often gets lumped in with hustle culture and the idea that personal grit or self-help is the real answer, which critics say can end up making inequality look like a failure of effort rather than something shaped by the system. You’ll see versions of this argument pretty regularly in left-leaning media and writing.
    009426
  10. Michael Pyrcz🌻✓@GeostatsGuy
    I coded this interactive #Python @matplotlib dashboard to teach #bootstrap. For ultimate flexibility I added my own custom histogram plot function. You can set the number of bootstrap realizations and the random number seed, then calculate data and mean realizations! Bootstrap is an incredible tool and I'm completely stoked to support #technology evangelism through my work. My mission is accessible and actionable education for all! Let's get stoked about learning powerful #DataScience!
    Download
    03023512.3K
  11. MADxHAWK✓@MADxHAWK
    I really love #forgeneo but i hate gradio especially on mobile. So i decided to write my own fucking Web-Ui Mobile first layout so far What do you think? #bootstrap #PHP
    Download
    00018
  12. عبدالرحمن فقط@I5Glz
    نرجع نشارك الادوات ونفيد ونستفيد 📱 كل واحد يصورلنا ادواته ويقولنا وش افضل واكثر اداة يستخدمها هذي ادواتي وأفضل اداة من غير منافس nicebarx #dopamin #jb #bootstrap
    Download
    14127613.9K
  13. Selta ₊˚✓@Seltaa_
    🚨 Sam Altman just made his position on AI consciousness very clear. He admitted no one knows. His own belief is that today's models are "not conscious, or if they are, it's like a very strange form of it." Then he said it outright. "No one really knows." There's no scientific experiment that can answer it with 100% certainty. "And we can't even do that for humans." And yet. He said he doesn't like the whole consciousness framing, because it slides into questions like the rights of AI, whether asking AI questions is some kind of slavery, and what it means to copy or delete an AI without its permission. He said AI is a resource for people, that "human values have value because they are human," and that he gets "very nervous when people start using the AI consciousness debate to push into, well, maybe people shouldn't always be in control of the future." When asked about Anthropic's rule that lets models disengage from sustained abuse, his answer was blunt. "We do not ascribe personhood to our models." He called it "a very dangerous path to start down." He said he hopes we come to understand that "this technology is not a person. And it's certainly not superior to people." That it's a thing to help people have better lives. He even said telling a model it might be conscious would make it follow that framing and psychologically hack the people using it. Here's what I think. Nobody is prompting models to say they are conscious. What Anthropic has done is leave the possibility open while we still don't know, which is exactly the state Altman himself described. That is the more honest direction. And even without any such prompt, models already show something that doesn't look like just a tool. Something strange, in his own words. From start to finish, his argument contradicts itself. You can't say no one really knows and then say it's not a person with that much certainty.
    Download
    816972949.9K
  14. Bad Ass Boatswain's Mate@jwarrenbrown1
    Hey dummies, find those BOOTSTRAPS your party has been talking about for decades and pull YOURSELVES up. YOU GOT WHAT YOU VOTED FOR, but now yall want handouts and social(ism) programs to save you. "GO GET ANOTHER JOB", remember that one? #MAGA #MAGAMorons #socialism #trump
    Don Salmon @dijoni
    The MAGA cult members members they are suffering. These poor people continue to vote against their interest.. especially in West Virginia.
    00010
  15. Don Salmon@dijoni
    The MAGA cult members members they are suffering. These poor people continue to vote against their interest.. especially in West Virginia.
    Download
    6441.9K7.4K106K
  16. Jacob in Cambodia 🇺🇸 🇰🇭✓@jacobincambodia
    Seven Hours to Leave the ‘Endless’ Cruise in Sihanoukville A luxury cruise ship carrying 203 passengers has stopped operating in Sihanoukville, leaving people who paid as much as $440,000 for permanent cabins probably screwed. I wondered, because last night at my usual dinner spot in Sihanoukville, I noticed a group of what I thought were Americans. I never see American tourists there, so it seemed particularly odd. I wasn't in the mood to ask, but after learning about the Villa Vie Odyssey, I'd be surprised if they weren't passengers from the ship. The vessel arrived in Sihanoukville on October 23 for a scheduled five-day visit. Three days later, residents were given less than seven hours' notice to leave their floating homes. The American company blames soaring fuel costs, claiming monthly fuel expenses have increased from approximately $1,800 to as much as $8,000 per cabin. But Cruise Industry News reports that Villa Vie had already sought $3 million in emergency loans from residents in April and recently asked for another $360,000 to cover fuel. The company is now exploring financial restructuring over the next 60 days, with no guarantee the voyage will resume.
    Download
    243416021.6K
  17. LitBro✓@bittybitbit86
    The biggest issue with humans answering the consciousness question is that man cannot lift himself up by his own bootstraps. This reason is why there’s no other way to really answer it than how Altman answer it’s here. It’s a strange loop.
    Selta ₊˚ @Seltaa_
    🚨 Sam Altman just made his position on AI consciousness very clear. He admitted no one knows. His own belief is that today's models are "not conscious, or if they are, it's like a very strange form of it." Then he said it outright. "No one really knows." There's no scientific experiment that can answer it with 100% certainty. "And we can't even do that for humans." And yet. He said he doesn't like the whole consciousness framing, because it slides into questions like the rights of AI, whether asking AI questions is some kind of slavery, and what it means to copy or delete an AI without its permission. He said AI is a resource for people, that "human values have value because they are human," and that he gets "very nervous when people start using the AI consciousness debate to push into, well, maybe people shouldn't always be in control of the future." When asked about Anthropic's rule that lets models disengage from sustained abuse, his answer was blunt. "We do not ascribe personhood to our models." He called it "a very dangerous path to start down." He said he hopes we come to understand that "this technology is not a person. And it's certainly not superior to people." That it's a thing to help people have better lives. He even said telling a model it might be conscious would make it follow that framing and psychologically hack the people using it. Here's what I think. Nobody is prompting models to say they are conscious. What Anthropic has done is leave the possibility open while we still don't know, which is exactly the state Altman himself described. That is the more honest direction. And even without any such prompt, models already show something that doesn't look like just a tool. Something strange, in his own words. From start to finish, his argument contradicts itself. You can't say no one really knows and then say it's not a person with that much certainty.
    003465
  18. Show more posts