#routine

Full body workout 🏋️‍♀️ #Dumbbells #routine

For Many Writers, Adopting a Consistent Routine Is the Key to Success #writing #writinglife #routine #writingcommunity #writesky

Every single runner in one place 📍 #downald -> $110k to $14.6m (132x) #routine -> $178k to $19m (106x) #italianrot -> $21k to $1.6m (78x) $trit -> $58k to $3.3m (57x) Catch up or get left behind 💰 Giving a free week to the best comment below 👇

Five days, five different picks #routine #fyp #satisfy #viral #lifestyle

Just watched #Clayface, the #DCU’s first body horror directed by #JamesWatkins written by #MikeFlanagan and starring #TomRhysHarries. Remember back in 2019 when #Joker came out, then a talk about a the creation of a DC Black Label in which grounded, mid-budget movies navigating different genres using DC villains, would be made, which never panned out? #Clayface literally is the pure embodiment of that concept, and an evidence of what we’ve been stolen. In a seamless transition to horror, with the focus being the main character’s development, demanding no previous knowledge/home work, no Easter eggs nor anything distracting the moviegoer from what is in front of their eyes, we could see a D-list villain getting a full, self contained origin story in front of our eyes, in the most appropriate tone for the character. CLAYFACE knows what it is and never looks away from it, and never aims for something bigger than what it should be. It truly believes the character it’s developing and the story at hand are enough to grasp the moviegoer, and oh boy, does it succeed!! The movie does not shy away from gruesome scenes, nor nudity. It uses its R rating at its fullest, and somehow it feels natural, not forced. And despite barely having actual jokes in the film, it manages to give the moviegoer so much fun via situations the character and the script navigate with such confidence and no self-seriousness. But what I liked the most is that #Clayface aka #MattHagen IS A VILLAIN. Making this movie a horror and not having an established movie-star as the lead probably helped the film to keep the character true to its core, avoiding the forced antihero trap route. The script is so committed to make sure we have no doubt about his villainous nature that one of the killings is there literally solely to serve this purpose. Yeah, the film is a revenge story, but while it justifies HOW Matt Hagen became CLAYFACE, it never tries to justify WHAT he became. Also, things only work so well because #TomRhysHarries is a true revelation. What an incredible job, and exquisite performance, literally a star-maker performance. He has that quality, and that aura which makes you feel like you already know him, even if it’s the first time you see him on the big screen. This guy is going places from here, I’m sure. Also, we need to normalise again giving more actors chances. Out of the whole cast, I only knew #NaomiAckie from previous films, and it felt so refreshing to see truly fresh faces populating the rest of the movie, including the leading man himself, and everyone doing a nice job. That’s another advantage of making this film as a horror, because I doubt studio heads would allow anything like it if it was made as a blockbuster. By the way, I loved the scientific explanation for the origin of CLAYFACE, the role of A.I., the subtle commentaries about beauty, access, corruption. It felt like a movie from any era pre-2010, when you would see messages if you wanted to, without being pushy in case you didn’t want to. The pacing was really enjoyable and the third act in this film is GLORIOUS! Mystique would be proud, haha! My only gripe with the film would be some of the dialogue. But I guess if you make of CLAYFACE a horror movie, you give your viewer the full experience, and the rocky dialogue used to be law in most horror films, so I think they took the mission to the heart 😂 I really had a great time with this one, and #Clayface to me is the most exciting thing out of the DCU so far other than #SUPERMAN itself. I can’t wait to see him again! But I also can’t wait to see this format being explored more. #Clayface shows well how to responsibly take risks, as contradictory as it sounds, haha. And I hope other villains get similar treatment. #Clayface is already in Cinemas worldwide.

Now seated for #Clayface! Trailers attached: #DexterResurrection #TheBeekeeper2 #TheHungerGames: #SunriseOnTheReaping #GodzillaMinusZero #Primetime #AvengersDoomsday #DunePartThree (IT’s CINEMA!!!) See you on the other side!!!

Stick to your #routine in order to give yourself the best chance of consistent #success. #MentalSweatMonday #MentalSweat

All tour/club pros have a great pre-shot #routine. Mine? 1. Pick a small target 2. Take two 110% practice swings 3. Pull. The. Trigger.

THIS IS AN ABSOLUTE F*CKING GOLD Anthropic just revealed one of the sharpest setups for Claude Code The idea: run autonomous agent teams across Opus 5.5, Sonnet 5.5, and Haiku 5.5, while keeping Fable 5.1 on call as adversary Zero coordinator bottlenecks and way fewer tokens: teammates talk directly over peer-to-peer mailboxes and claim tasks on their own You just launch Claude Code like this: CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 claude --model opus here's how it splits: → Opus 5.5 acts as team lead: breaks epics into a shared task list, arbitrates conflicts, and signs off on pull requests → Sonnet 5.5 powers builder teammates: hammers out frontend and backend modules in parallel, messaging peer-to-peer without coordinator drag → Haiku 5.5 swarms lightweight scouts: maps AST call sites, audits dependencies, and verifies API specs at 340 tok/s → Fable 5.1 monitors the peer bus on call: audits cross-session messages and catches subtle edge cases before code merges → you stop burning Opus context on routine implementation loops and keep the lead session lean Fable 5.1 only steps in at three moments: → before a contract locks: does the frontend payload match the backend schema? → when a test breaks twice: are we fixing the root cause or just patching symptoms? → before calling it done: what security hole or invariant did everyone overlook? Opus leads · Sonnet builds · Haiku scouts · Fable challenges JEV engineering is the same move one layer down: the forks that need no thinker (which file, which tool, retry or stop) go to JEV in milliseconds, and the big models only see the ones that split the full tree > Opus 5.5 coordinates the team and manages the shared task list at ~/.claude/tasks/ > Sonnet 5.5 runs builder teammates with direct peer-to-peer mailboxes at ~/.claude/teams/ > Haiku 5.5 runs fast scout teammates at 340 tok/s with zero coordinator lag > Fable 5.1 stays on call as adversary to challenge contracts and audit diffs > task dependencies unblock automatically as teammates mark work complete > JEV routes micro-forks in milliseconds paste the tree and this prompt into Claude Code ↓ "Rebuild my Claude Code setup around this tree: 1. Enable autonomous agent teams by setting CLAUDE_CODE_EXPERIMENTAL_AGENT_TEAMS=1 in settings.json 2. Run the main lead session on Opus 5.5 to manage architecture and the shared task list 3. Spawn Sonnet 5.5 teammates for feature builds and Haiku 5.5 for 340 tok/s repo sweeps 4. Keep Fable 5.1 on call as adversary to audit peer-to-peer messages and test failures 5. Add one rule to CLAUDE.md: teammates must consult Fable before locking API contracts, after two test failures, and before final PR sign-off 6. Route fast deterministic forks through JEV, show all changes as diffs first. No edits until I say go" ↳ save it, you'll use this every single day

Great video from 1st Stage of Q-School last week that shows how a #pro goes through his #routine. 1) Process your swing thoughts 2) Pull the trigger!

The balance and core control difference in this versus a traditional push up is fascinating #calisthenics #Fitness #routine #fyp #MentalHealth

I don't talk about the brand very much because I like to treat this account as a safe space to talk about oral health... BUT, I have been working on a new product for the last year and a half... and it's ready. We have a few tucked away to give away for our top creators but I begged @CalvinandNOBS to let me give some away to the X family. What is it? It's a microbiome balancer disguised as a breath mint. It looks and tastes like a breath mint but it's much more. Why did I make it? There is so much time for things to go wrong during the day between your morning and evening routine, and I found a cool way to make it an opportunity for things to go right. Ok so what does it actually do though? We call the formula FloraShift, and the name is very intentional. So many of us are walking around with an imbalance. The same type that can make you have IBS, acid reflux, a yeast infection can also happen in the mouth. This presents as bad breath, gum disease, cavities. We're even finding oral bacteria implicated in cancer, dementia and heart attacks. Oral dysbiosis causes a LOT of problems. Now, a mint won't solve that by itself but it *can* help nudge you in the right direction. FloraShift a symphony of ingredients chosen with the goal of restoring balance... encouraging the commensal and symbiotic bacteria, while curbing harmful bacteria. Not just thinking about what we can get rid of (like most products that just sterilize). Thinking about what we actually want to thrive: Xylitol: Starves cavity causing bacteria, stimulates saliva Beta-cyclodextrin: Plant-starch that will trap odor but more importantly impacts bacterial communication (quorum-quenching activity), interfering with bacterial chemical signaling. That communication can coordinate behaviors like biofilm formation. Basically a signal jammer for the bad bacteria. Magnesium citrate: Competition within the biofilm. Helping the bacteria we want hold their ground, and makes it harder for the pathogenic bacteria to hold on. L-arginine: Put useful bacteria to work. Certain mouth bacteria use it to produce acid-neutralizing compounds. Research also shows effects on biofilm structure and competition between health-associated and cavity-associated bacteria. Potassium bicarbonate: Buffer acid directly. A separate approach to acidity that doesn't depend on bacteria processing an ingredient first. It complements the bacterial route behind arginine. Potassium nitrate: The oral/systemic connection. Provides nitrate that certain mouth bacteria convert into nitrite, part of a pathway your body uses to make nitric oxide. Nitrate is also being studied for its effects on oral microbial communities. Zinc acetate: Odor chemistry and biofilm activity. Binds sulfur compounds involved in bad breath rather than just covering them up. Zinc also has laboratory evidence for antimicrobial and anti-biofilm activity. Peppermint + spearmint oils: More than the mint taste. They bring the flavor and aroma, but also have laboratory research behind their antimicrobial and anti-biofilm effects. So when I say FloraShift, I'm talking about the whole approach...What bacteria eat. How they communicate. How they compete. The biofilms they live in. The compounds they produce. That's what we @nobsroutines wanted to account for when making this. Not just some generic probiotic and calling it a day. Anyway, I have 20ish (maybe more) to give away. All I ask is that you comment with something that has helped your oral health, or even a problem you're currently struggling with. A share would be cool but not a requirement.

I feel the need… the need for SPEED! ✈️🇺🇸 Took the scenic route to the A&M game with the @NASA Administrator. Thank you @NASAAdmin! And thank you for your great partnership for our American farmers. Only one speed in this Administration: TRUMP SPEED!

#Routine 🔄 Power ➡️ Video ➡️ Volley ➡️

When i fuck for the first time and immediately hop on TikTok after #routine

#Daily #Routine #english #vocabulary

#bath #aftercare #routine #repetetion #stronger

Crushed it, 80 SOL from #routine. Dropped 34 SOL to the streets. Tomorrow? 16 SOL rains down. I eat, I win, I give, unstoppable. Engage. Stay disciplined.

Why is this guy on the @kornferrytour and you're sitting in a cubicle? Because he has a quick and repeatable pre-shot #routine and you don't.

A 3D reconstruction can be technically impressive and still fail the person who needs to use it. Imagine a warehouse robot planning a route through an aisle. The model captures the shelves perfectly, but misses a temporary barrier or doesn't represent the clearance accurately enough. The problem isn't whether the reconstruction looks realistic. It's whether the geometry supports the decision the robot needs to make. That's why I find @vangrid_io's approach to smartphone-based spatial capture interesting. Turning everyday footage into structured 3D data could make collecting real-world environments more accessible, but accessibility alone doesn't guarantee useful data. Personally, I'd pay close attention to how capture quality is measured and how outdated scans are identified. Those details determine whether a growing dataset becomes dependable infrastructure or just a larger archive of 3D models. For physical AI, what matters more: collecting more environments or proving that each capture is still useful?