mpozzecco✓
@mpozzecco
Web3 since 2021 / I make art and share the alpha / Never Financial Advice + DYOR
4.8K Following12.3K Followers115K Posts
- 35M monthly users ~88.5% losing money I think that says a lot most people are trading but very few are winning fees keep flowing platforms keep earning feels like the real winners aren't always the ones tradingBando @bandoseitotal monthly users: 35m losing traders: 88.5% where’s all this money going?30398
- Less than 10% of the world's population owns crypto. Around 741M people held crypto by the end of 2025. That's roughly 9% of the global population. Meaning more than 90% still have no exposure. The room for adoption is significant. But ownership alone isn't enough. What matters next is real usage, demand and retention.Watcher.Guru @WatcherGuruFUN FACT: Less than 10% of the global population is invested in cryptocurrency.002179
FUN FACT: Less than 10% of the global population is invested in cryptocurrency.8681.2K11.7K1.7M- Until you read the T&CsPump.fun @PumpfunThe MOST REWARDING referral program in crypto’s history. We’re giving away ALL of the Pumpfun App’s revenue via rewards! - Your referral deposits $50 → both of you get $50 on top - ~10% reduced fees for your referrals - Referrers get a limited-time 4x boost Learn more 👇100136
The MOST REWARDING referral program in crypto’s history. We’re giving away ALL of the Pumpfun App’s revenue via rewards! - Your referral deposits $50 → both of you get $50 on top - ~10% reduced fees for your referrals - Referrers get a limited-time 4x boost Learn more 👇1.1K4163.9K1.8M- On my TL I see that CT look at $STONK as just another Solana meme. I think that misses the actual setup. The token is only one part of it. The more important piece is StonkFun. StonkFun is trying to build a launch layer around speculative assets tied to the pre IPO stock narrative. So the structure is basically: $STONK = ecosystem token StonkFun = launch and discovery engine This matters because memes usually live or die in isolation. Here, the goal is to create repeatable flow. > New assets launch > they get marked as part of the StonkFun ecosystem > users can discover and trade them through social apps Fomo App already supports this. The next part is Launchlab. That should bring a better deployment flow and bonding curves. Bonding curves are simple. As demand comes in price moves higher along the curve This gives new tokens a cleaner way to find an early market price. It also means being early can matter more. DEX volume is around $225.6M cumulative. So there is already real participation. For me, the watchlist is clear: more StonkFun launches Fomo usage Launchlab rollout volume quality large holder behavior I don’t think the bet is only on one token. The better question is whether StonkFun can become a real launch venue for this niche. Hopefully, If yes $STONK probably captures more attention than a normal meme.002262
- Be the second Few 🫡R2D2 @R2D2zenObserving. Few accounts with large followings have become callers over the last month, buying tokens under 100k, posting about them on X and Telegram, then starting to sell within minutes. Believing they are the next Frank. Few accounts with large followings have also become callers over the last month, but rarely or never push micro cap tokens. Instead, they hustle to build communities, find conviction plays, form GCs, collaborate, and make money on the way up.002221
Observing. Few accounts with large followings have become callers over the last month, buying tokens under 100k, posting about them on X and Telegram, then starting to sell within minutes. Believing they are the next Frank. Few accounts with large followings have also become callers over the last month, but rarely or never push micro cap tokens. Instead, they hustle to build communities, find conviction plays, form GCs, collaborate, and make money on the way up.5451356.3K- strcUSX is live in YieldVault. It takes Strategy’s STRC dividend stream and brings it onchain through Solstice. STRC pays around 12%. strcUSX splits it: Senior gets paid first and targets ~7%. Junior takes first-loss risk and targets ~20%, variable. Simple structure. Same cash flow. Different risk. I’m watching deposits here. The key number is not only APY. It is how much real yield can move through Solana over time.
102184 - Posts @mpozzeccoFull disclosure: I’m part of the Solstice Ambassador Program. This post isn’t directly sponsored but educational and onboarding efforts within the Solstice ecosystem may be rewarded If you like to join Solstice for S3, you may use my referral code: dduTsqe3WR00170
- strcUSX is live in @solsticefi YieldVault. The source is STRC. > Strategy pays around 12% cash dividend. > Solstice takes that stream onchain and splits it into 2 tranches. Senior gets paid first. Target is around 7%. Junior is first loss. Target is around 20%. The key part is the buffer. Junior is sized roughly to match senior. So STRC needs to fall about 50% before senior principal starts taking pressure. Not risk free. But the risk is much easier to price. I like this structure because the yield source is not the same as eUSX.001159
- If you are new to YT or want to learn more about YT, you're at the right place. l highly recommend to watch the Travis breakdown. The basic mechanic is simple. You buy yield today. In return you get fixed exposure to points or future rewards from a project. So the question becomes price. > How much are you paying per point. > How much supply can the campaign create. > How likely is the token. > What FDV range makes sense. For tokened projects, I think this is easier. If a protocol already has a token and season 2 or 3 is running, you can price the reward in token terms. Example. If YT costs $1,000 and the expected reward is 5,000 tokens, your breakeven is $0.20 per token. Then you compare that with spot price and unlock risk. For tokenless projects, it is less clean. But I still do not see it as that different from an ICO. Except the price per point is visible. Not exact but usually enough to size the trade. I was introduced to YT to thanks to my bro @Gyokeres_eth and I’ve been using YT mostly where data is good and the downside is easy to define. Risk is real but unclear does not mean unpriceable.Travis 💡 @ProofOfTravisI'm seeing more people trading YTs and farming airdrop points on @ExponentFinance Some are getting 2x-10x returns depending on the trades and the airdrop value Here's a video just to help understand the concept of YTs as a trader: 0:00 Intro 0:55 Understanding YT value 1:40 Visualizing your YT bag 2:49 1st way to make money 3:30 2nd way to make money 5:33 Breaking down a personal example103280
I'm seeing more people trading YTs and farming airdrop points on @ExponentFinance Some are getting 2x-10x returns depending on the trades and the airdrop value Here's a video just to help understand the concept of YTs as a trader: 0:00 Intro 0:55 Understanding YT value 1:40 Visualizing your YT bag 2:49 1st way to make money 3:30 2nd way to make money 5:33 Breaking down a personal example44161519.8K- SEO isn’t dying. It’s splitting. Most brands still treat SEO as page-one rankings. I think that is too narrow now. Old SEO was: Rank on Google. Get clicks. Track backlinks. Report traffic. New SEO is: Get retrieved. Get cited. Get trusted by AI engines. ChatGPT. Gemini. Perplexity. AI Overviews. The useful number is from Semrush. Approx 90% of ChatGPT citations come from pages outside Google’s top 20. Not exact for every market. But the direction is clear. LLMs are not just copying SERPs. They pull context-fit pages. Niche sources. Original data. Clear explanations. I’m seeing teams celebrate page one while missing AI visibility. The real question is simple. Are you cited when buyers ask AI? Rankings still matter. But citations are becoming a separate channel. And I think the brands building for that now will compound faster.
102139 - KOL rounds always look different at the top $5k turns into millions on paper everyone thinks they caught the perfect deal on lab:native then vesting ends > liquidity is gone > attention is gone > and the real value is way lower that’s the problem with these rounds The headline return is not the return you actually get paper gains don’t matter much If you can’t exit anywhere close to them001200
- Most teams don’t have a marketing problem. They have an input problem. I keep seeing the same 5 patterns: “We need a marketer” Then the JD says: > strategy > content > social > SEO > ads > CRM > events > website > leads That is not a role. That is a department compressed into 1 person. Before hiring, define the business problem. Demand gen is different from brand. Lifecycle is different from content. Product marketing is different from paid acquisition. “We need more leads” Usually this means nothing yet. More than what? 100 per month or 1,000? Which segment? At what CAC? What conversion rate? What happens after the form is filled? A lead target without funnel math is just a wish. “We need to be everywhere” LinkedIn X TikTok newsletter SEO events podcasts community Presence is not strategy. If your buyers make decisions in 2 places, start with those 2. Distribution should follow customer behavior. Not competitor anxiety. “Marketing isn’t working” Based on what? Pipeline? Sales velocity? Conversion? Retention? Brand search? Website intent? You can’t fix marketing by blaming marketing. You need to diagnose the full funnel. “We need a new strategy” Sometimes you don’t. Sometimes the strategy was fine. The execution was just inconsistent for 6 months. My default view: marketing gets easier when the business is clear on what it wants marketing to solve. Not “do marketing.” Solve a specific constraint.
002186 - Most marketing teams don’t have a growth problem. They have an order problem. Let me explain it, most marketing teams do this backwards. They start with content. Then campaigns. Then paid ads. And only after that they ask why growth is weak. The issue is not execution speed. It is execution without strategy. A clean marketing flow should look like this: Strategy first. ICP. Market problem. Value prop. Positioning. Messaging. Then tactics. Channels. Campaigns. Priorities. KPIs. Then implementation. Content. Ads. Tracking. Optimization. The order matters. Strategy → Tactics → Implementation → Results But results are not the end. They are feedback. Every campaign gives data on what the market cares about, what language converts, and where demand is forming. That feedback should improve the strategy again. I think this is where modern search intelligence becomes useful. Not as another tactic. As a way to see market demand before spending budget on the wrong execution.
001117 - I started this piece by testing flow. AI nodes. Generative layers. A mix of structure and randomness. The goal was not to make it perfect. It was to see how far I could push precision before the system started producing something more organic. The final image landed somewhere between machine geometry and deep water. Metallic blues. Oxidized golds. Repeated forms that feel mechanical but still have movement. Too much control made it flat. Too much randomness made it lose direction. I kept the parts where the system felt like it was breathing. That became "Echoes of the Machine Sea" I think this is where AI art gets interesting. Not when it replaces intent. But when it adds another layer of decision-making to the process.
201167 - mpozzeccoRT @mpozzecco: I like the discussion here. strcUSX is easier to reason about when you reduce it to the flow. USX gets STRC yield exposure through @solsticefi. Not a vague incentive loop. There is an asset. There is cash flow. And there is a link back to Strategy’s BTC balance sheet thesis. I’m looking at it less like “high APY” and more like structured access to STRC yield.Solstice @solsticefiStrategy CEO @phongle loves strcUSX & how it pairs nicely with a glass of MSTR, STRC, and BTC.010317
- Posts @mpozzeccoFull disclosure: I’m part of the Solstice Ambassador Program. This post isn’t directly sponsored but educational and onboarding efforts within the Solstice ecosystem may be rewarded If you like to join Solstice for S3, you may use my referral code: dduTsqe3WR00026
- Show more posts
