Charliesangels47✓

Very special idiots. Why the bird name

They are telling us their plan.

What a very special idiot. @RealTruthJustic @RealCandaceO @thisauthentic

Charlie Kirk would never have entertained this whole “low IQ” insult as a legitimate argument. Reducing someone’s cognitive capacity to a cheap insult isn’t critical thinking. It’s what happens when an insult takes the place of an argument. Hashtag debate skills 101!

RT @britneyscrave: MTV’s ‘Making The Video’ series is so iconic… Because wdym we’re getting to see Britney Spears film the ICONIC music video for ‘Toxic’? This feels like watching Da Vinci painting Mona Lisa 😭

RT @CrystalSmallen: Erica Erica Erica.. I think you're in big trouble. And I think you know it.

RT @billiewebbb: the only thing that Trump’s post persuaded me to believe is that HE may have also had foreknowledge of Charlie Kirk’s assassination

RT @ProjectConstitu: 🚨BREAKING: Candace Owens Wins Major Legal Victory — Delaware Court Personally Dismisses Her From Macron Lawsuit After Filing Motion To Dismiss ⚖️ 👀 Candace Owens announced today that she has been personally dismissed from the defamation lawsuit filed against her by French President Emmanuel Macron and his wife in Delaware Superior Court. This was not a voluntary dismissal by the Macrons. Owens’ legal team filed a motion to dismiss arguing that Delaware courts lacked personal jurisdiction over her as an individual because she lives in Tennessee and has no personal connection to the state. The court granted that motion as to her personally. Her Delaware-incorporated companies remain in the case. She clarified that she was never sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born male. The claims centered on other allegations, including discussions of MK Ultra and accusations of theft. A sitting foreign leader attempted to drag an American podcaster into a U.S. court from outside his own country. The Delaware judge looked at the jurisdictional arguments and removed her as an individual defendant. FOLLOW @RealCandaceO for Updates.

RT @Keats_90: Just look at how giddy and exited he is about digging up dirt on someone who's trying to find out who did what to Charlie Kirk how and why. Seriously! WTF! Sure @realstewpeters isn't innocent nor is @RealCandaceO or @baroncoleman . So what! We all have a past. But when you get this exited about what Danks and his AI bull shit dig up about someone's past several years ago and use it to try and discredit them today..... You look pathetic! And why should anyone trust you? I'm sure you have a past that at times you're not proud of. If this is how your going to run you're channels/platforms from now on, best of luck cause people will get tired of it real fast! Go back to focusing on TPUSA, and the Charlie Kirk investigation. You might gain some of the thousands of followers you've lost.

RT @Charliesteam47: @RealCandaceO @RealCandaceO @RealTruthJustic you look cool Charlie. Congratulations!

RT @RealCandaceO: I am in the absolute best mood over this Macron dismissal. Feels like a year and a half of my family having to deal with psychotic lies regarding pending bankruptcies, secret accounts and plans to flee the country, has finally come to end. For those of you wondering what happens now with the case, here is a synopsis: You will note the Macrons additionally named two other business entities in their lawsuit: Candace Owens LLC and GeorgeTom Inc. They admitted in our hearing that they were unsure if one or both of these entities housed the podcast and that they would need limited discovery to determine how those businesses run and who runs them. As it turns out, one of the above mentioned entities has absolutely nothing to do with the podcast in any way, shape, or form, so it will be a legal exercise in futility for the couple. In effect, that leaves just one entity. In addition to my personal dismissal, the court also decided in favor of our argument that France’s defamation law should apply. Let me explain to you why that decision deeply impacts matters and was a major point of legal contention; France’s defamation law has a statute of limitation of just 3 months. This means defamation claims time out very quickly. We argued the Macron couple was intentionally forum shopping because being held to France’s 3 months would have naturally expired their claims. We included a briefing from a French legal expert explaining French defamation law. The Macrons did not submit a briefing to counter our arguments, but during oral arguments they suggested that France has a unique statutory law that could, in theory, extend claims up to one year IF the defamation claim pertains to an individual’s sexual orientation or gender. Before ruling on the dismissal pertaining to the remaining entities, the judge is allowing for the Macron couple to submit a supplemental brief, arguing why they believe this case could meet that threshold In his response (see below), the Judge has duly noted our legal expert’s notation that in parallel cases filed by the Presidential couple against other journalists in France, the couple sued under France’s 3 month defamation rule—not the one year statutory. I believe it is worth again noting that the couple is NOT and has never sued anyone for matters pertaining to sex, sexual orientation, or gender (despite intentional media misrepresentations), but rather for defamation related to claims regarding MK Ultra and theft. You are free to read their initial filing against me yourself. So what happens now is the remaining entities and the Macrons submit additional briefings regarding French law and statutes. The judge will then rule on the lingering dismissals.

🚨BREAKING NEWS: I was just personally dismissed from the Macron lawsuit filed against me in Delaware. This case represents one of the grossest, legal overreaches by a foreign government leader in human history—a sitting President’s attempt to personally bankrupt a single podcaster from outside the nation in which he governs. And to formally reiterate since many reporters willfully lied about this most important detail: I was NEVER being sued for stating that Brigitte Macron was born a male. I was instead being sued for discussing MK Ultra and for allegedly accusing the “First Lady” of theft from her sister. I am tremendously grateful to the Delaware courts and to the presiding Judge for looking at this case objectively, despite false media depictions and government pressures.

We know about polymarket and kalshi. We know know.

What happened in the suv

A few more. Pink hat dude. @RealCandaceO

Moments Before Charlie Kirk’s Assassination This photo was originally posted on Facebook by Bradley Griffin, who stated he captured it just moments before the tragedy. 🪧Henry Dells is still speaking. I guess it wasn’t time to put the big signs up yet!! 📸 Credit: Bradley Griffin (Facebook)

One angle of pink hat dude @zannyholiday @BlakeBednarz

Maybe she’s born with it 🤣@WhatTheFekete maybe it’s Maybellene lol

Maybe they were the only thing that fit. #neimanmarcus #erikakirk

Debunking the Internet’s Biggest Conspiracy About Erika Kirk via @YouTube Why add the gladiator soundtrack. Just saying. Neutral. Yall fight this out yourselves.

Thank you bajesus she’s back!

🍿📢 NEW VIDEO DROPPED 🐔 Scarika and the Two Cackling Chicken Heads on the Right 🔥 Like — Share — Subscribe🔥 @chicksonright @MrsErikaKirk

RT @Charliesteam47: @TransSplendor The hobo stick. It worked for a reason. lever, fulcrum, mechanical advantage.

Go Wendy!

Advice for Erika, too bad she is so proud, she would never humble herself to actually take some feedback. If you are smart, you don’t surround yourself with yes men, you surround yourself with people who aren’t afraid to speak truth. Notoriously, people who surround themselves with yes men wind up falling flat.