English
Sanya Talwar
Report

Sanya Talwar✓

@LegalTalwar

Founding Editor @lawbeatind | Shambhu is in the questions, in the ache and in the dearth of, in the lack of

1.2K Following30.4K Followers43.3K Posts
  1. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Week after week, we’re trying to bring you conversations that matter, on law, public affairs, civil society and issues that shape our systems. To keep building and doing more of this, we need one simple thing from you: subscribe to our YouTube channel. Please. 🙏🏻 It genuinely helps us keep going.
    372659.3K
  2. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨🚨BREAKING | Supreme Court directs journalist Nikhil Wagle to appear virtually, Sanjay Raut physically in contempt proceedings over social media posts against CJI Surya Kant.
    LawBeat @LawBeatInd
    🚨Shortly before Supreme Court- Criminal Contempt Petition filed by Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)against Journalist Nikhil Wagle and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut over their comments against the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. On October 16, the Court had issued contempt notice to both. Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi
    036023
  3. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: Senior Advocate Indira Jaisingh appears for Nikhil Wagle. She informs the Bench that Wagle has issued an unconditional apology. @IJaising also takes the court through the entire apology.
    03023
  4. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨Shortly before Supreme Court- Criminal Contempt Petition filed by Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA)against Journalist Nikhil Wagle and Rajya Sabha MP Sanjay Raut over their comments against the Chief Justice of India Surya Kant. On October 16, the Court had issued contempt notice to both. Bench: Justices Aravind Kumar and Vipul M. Pancholi
    021019
  5. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: Is the collegium row between Justices Kaul and Chandrachud personal? 🎥 Watch the full conversation on LawBeat’s YouTube channel: The public exchange between the two former Supreme Court judges has raised questions about what happened inside the collegium—and why those concerns are being voiced now. Senior Adv @rakesh1dwivedi clarifies On Cut to the Chase with @LegalTalwar, we discuss the controversy and what it means for the conversation around judicial appointments. #CutToTheChase #LawBeat #Collegium #SupremeCourt #JudicialAppointments
    02021
  6. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @JethmalaniM: I do hope that clown prince and his coterie of left-radicals and hardcore Islamists, and puppets of the dynasty understand the meaning of the word - 'unanimous' - and the weight of the word - 'affidavit'.
    0300033
  7. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @tanyaelisabethh: It’s sad to think features like these have survived centuries, thousands of years of human history. Hooded eyes, aquiline noses, strong eyebrows, round cheeks, thinner lips, tall, larger built, square jaws, the very faces our mothers, our grandmothers carried, all of it stretching back to queens and peasants alike. Features that have survived it all, seen it all, and all for you to be told now — well it’s just not attractive. Imagine inheriting a face shaped by the entirety of human history, imagine being blessed with a beauty that has survived the many rises and falls of humanity, only to be told you now have to give it all up to the vanities of this generation. What worth is beauty without any history? What worth is beauty without meaning? What worth is beauty when it stops being something we recognize and instead becomes just something we manufacture?
    cinesthetic. @TheCinesthetic
    Jennifer Lawrence photographed for The Cut 📸
    0835032
  8. cinesthetic.✓@TheCinesthetic
    Jennifer Lawrence photographed for The Cut 📸
    Download
    1.4K1564.8K10.4M
  9. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @TweetinderKaul: Parliament used to be a different thing. Not been like this for a long time.
    We Dravidians-Voice of Early Indians @WeDravidians
    RamVilas ji 's Fiery Speech... Still relevant! #GreatOldDays #Parliament #India
    04032
  11. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @PrasadKarwa: Have a serious question - 1. These people don't have any job 2. They claim that they are from humble background, have studied on loans 3. Since last 3-4 months, they are chilling. No work. Travelling extensively, spending nights in 5 star hotels. Doing absolutely nothing. 4. They haven't done any crowdfunding or anything. 5. WHO IS FUNDING THEM? They demand accountability from everyone. But what about themselves?
    𝐉𝐨𝐝 𝐈𝐧𝐬𝐚𝐧𝐞 @jod_insane
    Dipke baune stop using Rohit Sharma goated phrases. You aren’t looking funny
    0273037
  13. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @JethmalaniM: Judicial independence is a constitutional principle, Justice Kaul. It ill behoves a retired Supreme Court judge to assert that he was an independent judge in his memoirs; that verdict ought to be left for posterity to decide, based on his judgements. Unless the judge is riven with doubts about his independence! Most certainly, anecdotal evidence about wrangling in the collegium are an extremely poor foundation for self-assertions about one's 'independence' as a judge. The timing of the release of Justice Kaul’s memoirs are as ominous as it’s content. It comes on the eve of a Supreme Court hearing and decision on the issue of alleged dissensions within the ECI and the legality of some measures introduced by it. Now let's dissect what's happening: the cockroaches are intent on pressuring the judiciary as the SIR process has weeded out bogus voters which has clearly raised the hackles of the entire unhinged Left/radical Islamists combine (that also includes the INC and some I.N.D.I. allies). On the heels of the eyebrow raising visit of Justice Kaul to Saurav Das’ Diwali party last year followed a scathing personal attack on Justice Suryakant around the time he became CJI in November of that year in one of the combine’s favourite mouthpieces - Caravan. The article was a republication of a 2019 article in the magazine published when CJI. Suryakant was elevated to the Supreme Court that year. Along with his proclaimed fierce independence while serving on the Bench - a claim which needs more analysis than his own self-serving assertion; and his denigration of former CJI Chandrachud as too deferential to the executive is a clarion call to sitting judges to oppose the executive if they wanted to earn the latter’s respect. In the light of his unexplained association with Saurav Das - the vaunted cockroach of the anti-SIR & anti-CEC agitation - the timing and the publicised thrust of his memoirs raise a grave question. ▶ Is he calling upon members of the judiciary to decide the validity of SIR , the related issue of CEC internal divisions and the legality of its processes against the executive and in favour of the protesting anarchists? ▶ Is a former Supreme Court judge using his considerable heft to influence the direction of a most important pending verdict of the Apex Court?
    STAR Boy TARUN @Starboy2079
    In an interview with journalist Karan Thapar for The Wire, Justice Kaul said that former Chief Justice of India, Justice DY Chandrachud, was in the practice of discussing names proposed for judicial appointments with the Government before the Supreme Court Collegium formally deliberated on them. Now, Congress is using this statement to target the judiciary. This statement should not be taken in isolation. Let us connect it with some of the events that happened in the past: 1. Photos are circulating showing that Justice Kaul attended a Diwali party at the residence of Cockroach Saurav Das. Why would a Supreme Court judge visit the house of an unknown, unemployed person? 2. Congress Kerala’s official handle targeted the Indian judiciary a few days ago. 3. At the same time, Rahul Gandhi, along with an opposition crowd, marched to the Supreme Court premises, created chaos, and entered forcibly. 4. Students of left-liberal institutes such as TISS and NALSAR Hyderabad and NLU Bangalore opposed the CJI and observed a one-day fast in support of the same ecosystem. 5. The CJI was targeted in London by the wife of CPI-ML President Deepankar Bhattacharya. 6. Justice Chandrachud was once a favourite of the left ecosystem; now the same ecosystem is targeting the Indian judiciary by using his name. 7. When Kaul was Madras HC Chief Justice, Karnan repeatedly attacked him with serious allegations of harassment, belittlement, etc., and even tried contempt proceedings. SC later jailed Karnan for contempt The message is very clear. The left ecosystem is meticulously targeting the Indian judiciary because it knows it is likely to lose the SIR case in the Supreme Court. It is therefore trying to create a fake narrative that the Supreme Court takes permission from the Modi government before delivering judgments. A well-crafted plan to damage Indian democratic institutions is underway by the global communist-socialist ecosystem.
    0345041
  14. STAR Boy TARUN✓@Starboy2079
    In an interview with journalist Karan Thapar for The Wire, Justice Kaul said that former Chief Justice of India, Justice DY Chandrachud, was in the practice of discussing names proposed for judicial appointments with the Government before the Supreme Court Collegium formally deliberated on them. Now, Congress is using this statement to target the judiciary. This statement should not be taken in isolation. Let us connect it with some of the events that happened in the past: 1. Photos are circulating showing that Justice Kaul attended a Diwali party at the residence of Cockroach Saurav Das. Why would a Supreme Court judge visit the house of an unknown, unemployed person? 2. Congress Kerala’s official handle targeted the Indian judiciary a few days ago. 3. At the same time, Rahul Gandhi, along with an opposition crowd, marched to the Supreme Court premises, created chaos, and entered forcibly. 4. Students of left-liberal institutes such as TISS and NALSAR Hyderabad and NLU Bangalore opposed the CJI and observed a one-day fast in support of the same ecosystem. 5. The CJI was targeted in London by the wife of CPI-ML President Deepankar Bhattacharya. 6. Justice Chandrachud was once a favourite of the left ecosystem; now the same ecosystem is targeting the Indian judiciary by using his name. 7. When Kaul was Madras HC Chief Justice, Karnan repeatedly attacked him with serious allegations of harassment, belittlement, etc., and even tried contempt proceedings. SC later jailed Karnan for contempt The message is very clear. The left ecosystem is meticulously targeting the Indian judiciary because it knows it is likely to lose the SIR case in the Supreme Court. It is therefore trying to create a fake narrative that the Supreme Court takes permission from the Modi government before delivering judgments. A well-crafted plan to damage Indian democratic institutions is underway by the global communist-socialist ecosystem.
    Download
    365271.1K55.2K
  16. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨 SUPREME COURT | “₹11,000 to ₹1,30,000 is no calibration!” The Supreme Court pulls up the Centre over the massive price difference in life-saving cancer drugs, questioning the government's claim that it is constantly calibrating drug prices. “Your calibration is too wayward,” the Court tells ASG Aishwarya Bhati. “The patients don’t have any bargaining power.” Justice Sandeep Mehta flags the helplessness of patients facing exorbitant medical costs, observing that they have no real bargaining power when it comes to accessing essential medicines. The Centre responds that complete control over prices is not the answer.
    LawBeat @LawBeatInd
    🚨 SUPREME COURT | “Can you show any justification for this loot?” A cancer patient’s husband, a medical distributor, told the Supreme Court that an injection available to him at a dealer price of ₹11,000 was allegedly priced at ₹1.30 lakh by a reputed hospital, which refused to administer the injection he offered. “Why this difference? Where does the money go?” Justice Sandeep Mehta asks the Centre.
    040033
  17. LawBeat✓@LawBeatInd
    🚨 SUPREME COURT | “Can you show any justification for this loot?” A cancer patient’s husband, a medical distributor, told the Supreme Court that an injection available to him at a dealer price of ₹11,000 was allegedly priced at ₹1.30 lakh by a reputed hospital, which refused to administer the injection he offered. “Why this difference? Where does the money go?” Justice Sandeep Mehta asks the Centre.
    Download
    539483.1K140K
  18. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Look at me, arguing about choice and karwa chauth, and getting ready for it in a day because I want my daughter to see how cute the whole thing is. Apropos my childhood memories of mom and dad on Karwa Chauth. The things life makes you do….! Ram…
    26601.9K
  19. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @parijatpragya: A protest is defined by the conviction behind it, not the coordinates on which it takes place… The denotification of Jantar Mantar as a protest site does not diminish the principle that dissent is neither confined to a designated space nor contingent upon a physical gathering. If a cause moves you, you can voice your concern on X, from the privacy of your home, outside an institution, or within any lawful public space! My views for @LawBeatInd
    LawBeat @LawBeatInd
    Is shifting protest sites a regulation or a restriction? AOR Pragya Parijat Singh on the Jantar Mantar denotification, designated sites and where the line between regulating and prohibiting protest falls. #JantarMantar #RightToProtest #DelhiProtests #LawBeat #LegalNews
    03037
  20. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨🚨WAS J. CHANDRACHUD SOFT ON THE GOVERNMENT? 🎥 Watch the full conversation on YouTube: ⚖️ ELECTORAL BONDS. AMU. AND A QUESTION FOR CHANDRACHUD’S CRITICS. If Justice Chandrachud ruled against the government in major cases, can he be called deferential to it? Sr Adv @rakesh1dwivedi asks
    05023
  22. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Senior Advocate Rakesh Dwivedi on the Collegium showdown
    LawBeat @LawBeatInd
    🚨 WHY DID JUSTICE KAUL WAIT TO SPEAK? He was number two in the Collegium. If he had reservations about judicial appointments, why didn’t he raise them at the time? Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi (@rakesh1dwivedi) in the Kaul-Chandrachud controversy. On Cut to the Chase with @LegalTalwar
    15472.8K
  23. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨 WHY DID JUSTICE KAUL WAIT TO SPEAK? He was number two in the Collegium. If he had reservations about judicial appointments, why didn’t he raise them at the time? Sr Adv Rakesh Dwivedi (@rakesh1dwivedi) in the Kaul-Chandrachud controversy. On Cut to the Chase with @LegalTalwar
    058026
  25. Sanya Talwar✓@LegalTalwar
    Sanya Talwar
    RT @LawBeatInd: 🚨🚨Breaking : Kerala Congress apologizes to CJI Surya Kant, for the publication of the "Resign Now-We will find replacement" social media post and the disrespect conveyed by its language. It says person responsible for the post has been removed @INCKerala
    0681018
  27. Show more posts