Triune Presidency End Single Executive Authority & Replace the Supreme Court, Eliminate Senate!
The "Color Revolution" RAD players plan that Data Republican uncovered.
The Radical Revolutionary Framework: Bridge, Block, Belong, Build, Reform in Action. The Unity USA co-founder collaborates with former USAID staff member to radically reshape America from within.
Reiff, an Obama-era USAID staff member who was later fired under the Trump administration, was previously involved in the Georgia Rose Revolution.
Dr. Paul Zeitz, co-founder of Unity USA and host of the Revolutionary Optimism podcast, has advanced proposals through the organization’s discussion papers to alter the structure of the U.S. government via citizen-led processes.
In materials co-authored with Nick Coccoma and Max Goodman, Unity USA outlines changes to the judicial branch that would replace the current Supreme Court with a rotating bench of 15 justices selected by lottery from a larger pre-vetted Judicial Assembly of roughly 1,500 members.
The proposal shifts confirmation away from the Senate to independent citizens’ juries, and establish a People’s Constitutional Assembly or Forum capable of reviewing or holding landmark decisions when triggered by a minority of the Judicial Assembly or a two-thirds vote in Congress.
Legislative proposals in related Unity USA papers include eliminating the Senate on grounds of unequal representation, ending single-member congressional districts, and introducing a sortition-based People’s Assembly as a chamber or additional branch.
Executive reforms detailed in an August 2024 discussion paper call for replacing the single presidency with a Triune Presidency of three co-equal Co-Presidents focused on diplomacy and defense, environment and infrastructure, and economic and social justice, serving staggered six-year terms with major decisions requiring two-thirds agreement.
Instead of our current three co-equal branches of government, the proposal desires a ceremonial First Citizen as head of state; expanded Cabinet structures with domain assignments; Citizens’ Advisory Councils selected by lottery for ongoing oversight and ethics review; and limits on war and emergency powers.
These ideas are framed as inputs for deliberation rather than fixed amendments, with the core mechanism being state-level and national Citizens’ Assemblies of randomly selected participants intended to develop recommendations for a refreshed Constitution.
In the current former-USAID ecosystem (as described in DataRepublican’s October 2026 “Democracy Files” reporting and the 2025 Daily Caller/NOTUS coverage of DemocracyAID), these skills are being applied domestically across many non-governmental organizations including Dr. Zeitz's Unity USA organization.
His organization also has participated in the No Kings rallies.
Danielle M. Reiff, senior advisor to Unity USA, co-coordinator with Zeitz of the Renew American Democracy platform, and founder of the Peacebuilders initiative, has not published comparable detailed structural proposals for the judicial, legislative, or executive branches.
In her writings and in the December 2025 episode of the Revolutionary Optimism podcast with Zeitz, Reiff emphasizes process-oriented reforms centered on nationwide deliberation, state and national Citizens’ Assemblies, a cross-partisan “Third Force,” and a “Fourth Founding” or “Great American Deliberation” to generate a People’s Proposal capable of addressing institutional shortcomings in resolving conflict.
Reiff outlined at a high level the bridge-build-block-belong framework as four complementary approaches for renewing the democratic ecosystem: bridging divides through a relationship-building framework at the local level, building institutions that foster collaboration, blocking toxic influences and harm, and fostering belonging at the local level where people can engage.
Reiff has emphasized process-oriented citizen deliberation over fixed structural blueprints, while both identify Citizens’ Assemblies as the mechanism for developing any changes to the existing judicial, executive, and legislative structures.
Both Zeitz and Reiff identify Citizens’ Assemblies as one primary vehicle through which any alterations to the existing separation of powers, judicial selection and review, legislative structure, and executive organization would be developed and potentially advanced.
The DSA’s domestic proposal of radically changing our existing co-equal branches of government largely resembles the same institutional forms proposed by Dr. Zeitz.
The process may be different but the end result mirrors the preference of outlined by Zeitz.
