Megan Basham✓

@megbasham

Journalist, NYT bestselling author, @realDailyWire. Other words: @wsj @washingtonpost @telegraph. Unabashed church lady. Aspiring matriarch. "Christian pitbull"

1.9K Following219K Followers83.7K Posts
  1. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    For years, the American Church has been overrun with leaders who are selling out their ministries to the highest bidders, giving wolves access to their sheep in exchange for elite respectability. Rather than the truth of Scripture, high-profile pastors are preaching trendy social causes and reaping the spoils of the media's adulation. The left's march through the institutions has brought it to the last bastion--the Church--and if it could, it would bring that edifice, too, toppling down to serve its political purposes. Who is being bought and who is doing the buying? Why are our seminaries training students to be climate change activists and social justice warriors? Why are the Bible's instructions for handling accusations being thrown out while "trauma experts" are being brought in? You've had your suspicions. Now you will have answers. I've spent the last two years investigating the capitulation, compromise, and propaganda peddling. I'm naming names and bringing receipts. I have received cease and desist threats from one of the country's most powerful law firms. My publisher has received letters from major ministries asking for meetings about their "concerns." Backroom powerbrokers have tried to discredit and derail my project. By God's grace, they've all failed. You WILL learn which leaders and ministries are pimping their pulpits, cozying up to leftist sugardaddies, and embracing the world's oldest profession. Coming this July. Preorders open.
    Download
    1.5K2.8K9.4K3.8M
  2. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @rachelbovard: Some of this ignorance of events is intentional, but it’s also the result of niche-ified media. The corporate press is almost exclusively left wing and simply won’t report on abuses like this, which means half the country has no idea what’s actually happening. We are on two different information planets.
    0170564
  3. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @The_real_annek: I can't do it... I can't watch France being burned to the ground...
    020528
  4. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @captive_dreamer: James Lindsay is not really any different from Candace Owens. They do the same sort of schizophrenic “pattern recognition” bit totally bereft of causality. “This person knows this person who talked about this person once.” It’s all very silly.
    0470532
  5. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @Heminator: Having lived through 2020, one thing I find utterly unforgivable is any defense of rioting and looting.
    Inevitable West @Inevitablewest
    🚨BREAKING: A distressed woman is restrained by left-wing thugs and forced to watch her livelihood destroyed France has become hell on earth.
    0890540
  6. Inevitable West✓@Inevitablewest
    🚨BREAKING: A distressed woman is restrained by left-wing thugs and forced to watch her livelihood destroyed France has become hell on earth.
    Download
    2.7K7.5K28.4K12.7M
  7. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @visegrad24: Dior had no faith in the French police to protect their store so they brought in their own security team to protect the flagship store in Paris tonight
    010K0489
  8. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @JoshuaSteinman: I know how to stop this but you’re not going to like it.
    Inevitable West @Inevitablewest
    🚨BREAKING: The historic Limoges town hall has just completely collapsed after far-left rioters set it on fire It was built in 1876. It survived World Wars. It did not survive modern France.
    01000537
  9. Inevitable West✓@Inevitablewest
    🚨BREAKING: The historic Limoges town hall has just completely collapsed after far-left rioters set it on fire It was built in 1876. It survived World Wars. It did not survive modern France.
    Download
    3.4K13.7K60K7.6M
  10. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @TheBabylonBee: Calvinist Dog Corrects Owner: ‘No One Is A Good Boy’
    02220394
  11. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @FreeNortherner: Condemn @conceptualjames for calling a Christian woman a bitch and seeing she's been "marked". Condemn him for his support for abortion. Condemn him for his support for pornography. That you haven't must mean you support abortion, pornography, and calling Christina women bitches
    Mikale Olson @realmikolson
    And let’s not forget that what someone refuses to say can be just as revealing as what they openly endorse. When someone repeatedly refuses to criticize individuals with a long, well-documented history of reprehensible beliefs or behavior, that silence raises legitimate questions. At some point, there are two uncomfortable possibilities: Either they privately sympathize with the very ideas they refuse to condemn, or they’re too afraid of upsetting their political allies to stand on principle. Neither is a particularly flattering explanation. One suggests ideological agreement. The other suggests moral cowardice. And neither deserves a free pass simply because the person knows how to carefully word their public statements.
    020565
  12. Mikale Olson✓@realmikolson
    Posts @realmikolson
    And let’s not forget that what someone refuses to say can be just as revealing as what they openly endorse. When someone repeatedly refuses to criticize individuals with a long, well-documented history of reprehensible beliefs or behavior, that silence raises legitimate questions. At some point, there are two uncomfortable possibilities: Either they privately sympathize with the very ideas they refuse to condemn, or they’re too afraid of upsetting their political allies to stand on principle. Neither is a particularly flattering explanation. One suggests ideological agreement. The other suggests moral cowardice. And neither deserves a free pass simply because the person knows how to carefully word their public statements.
    53378K
  13. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @carney: There’s something very strange going on with how Americans, especially American intellectuals on the right and the left, understand the Civil War. This centers around the now common use of words likes “traitors” and “treason.” For much of the twentieth century, the dominant national story was about a terrible conflict that had been overcome. The Union was preserved, slavery was abolished, and the former enemies were reunited as Americans. There was room within that understanding to admire Grant and Lee, to regard the Union cause as just, and nevertheless to honor the Confederate dead. The newer way of talking seems to treat the Civil War as an unresolved moral conflict. The Confederates remain enemies of the American nation, even 160 years after their defeat. Their wrongdoing remains sufficiently alive that honoring their dead becomes an affront to American patriotism. What's particularly interesting about the word traitor is that it carries an implication of permanent exclusion. A defeated enemy can be reconciled. A rebel can be pardoned. But calling someone a traitor, particularly long after the conflict has ended, emphasizes the betrayal rather than the possibility of forgiveness. And perhaps that's why the language bothers you. It seems to repudiate a settlement that earlier Americans had considered an important achievement. There's also a curious historical reversal here. In 1865, the Union had every reason to be angry at the Confederates. The killing was fresh, and the tremendous sacrifices were still being counted. Yet the victorious leadership pursued reconciliation. Today, when nobody alive participated in the war, some Americans seem to have rediscovered the anger of 1865. Why should Americans in 2026 feel a need to condemn Confederate soldiers more fiercely than Americans did in 1926 or 1976?
    0730603
  14. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @Teaethics: I've muted almost everyone in James Lindsay's camp. The combination of hyper-dramatic moralism, fearful/angry accusations, plus shallow argumentation grates on my nerves, and it seem to be almost universal among his peeps.
    020564
  15. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Posts @megbasham
    Context here:
    Megan Basham @megbasham
    I said that I had not seen my friend @seanmdav defend Tucker since Tucker's views diverted from my own. I have zero problem saying I disagree with my friend Sean here (see how we can have different views yet refrain from accusing each other of being an "op"? That is something that comes from Lindsey and Michael O'Fallon and those who cultishly believe everything they say. Just because people disagree does not mean its an "op"). I HAVE spoken about my disagreements with Tucker's current trajectory a number of times. I have also shared why I am not going to condemn Tucker. And I have tried to help confused onlookers understand why so many in conservative media have been deeply torn about Tucker because of his past great kindnesses to so many. So here is my story. When I found out I my cancer had been upgraded to Stage Four, you can imagine how desperate and scared I was. I had been told that none of the immunotherapies that have been developed for CRC apply to me. I would have to depend on the same old chemo regimen that has left so many people in my situation dead within a few years. Out of desperation, I submitted my records for the @ImmunityBio trial. Twice. But I heard nothing back. At about my lowest and most fearful point, I heard an interview Tucker did with @DrPatrick and a cutting edge FDA trial they were doing in colon cancers. I didn't know Tucker well, but I had his cell phone number from the time I appeared on his Fox News program. I was embarrassed to ask for his help, but once you reach Stage Four, you pretty much have no shame. I texted and asked if perhaps he would be willing to put me in touch with someone at ImmunityBio who might review my records again. He immediately replied, "Forget that, I'm just going to call and tell them to admit you to the trial." And he did. A couple months later, I was flying out to Los Angeles for my first round of treatment with Anktiva, Dr. Patrick's cutting edge immunotherapy. We won't know for some time, of course, whether it prove to prolong or even save my life. But we do know it is the only hope we had at the darkest moment in our families' life. So despite our disagreement with many of Tucker's views these days, if I am alive in ten years, I can assure you that my husband and children will bless the fact that we knew him. So I understand that you and @ConceptualJames and @SovMichael and @DefiyantlyFree think nothing else should matter when their mob wants a struggle session and demands denoucements, but I have explained in the past you why I am not going to oblige you. And I'm not going to oblige now either.
    00161.7K
  16. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    I said that I had not seen my friend @seanmdav defend Tucker since Tucker's views diverted from my own. I have zero problem saying I disagree with my friend Sean here (see how we can have different views yet refrain from accusing each other of being an "op"? That is something that comes from Lindsey and Michael O'Fallon and those who cultishly believe everything they say. Just because people disagree does not mean its an "op"). I HAVE spoken about my disagreements with Tucker's current trajectory a number of times. I have also shared why I am not going to condemn Tucker. And I have tried to help confused onlookers understand why so many in conservative media have been deeply torn about Tucker because of his past great kindnesses to so many. So here is my story. When I found out I my cancer had been upgraded to Stage Four, you can imagine how desperate and scared I was. I had been told that none of the immunotherapies that have been developed for CRC apply to me. I would have to depend on the same old chemo regimen that has left so many people in my situation dead within a few years. Out of desperation, I submitted my records for the @ImmunityBio trial. Twice. But I heard nothing back. At about my lowest and most fearful point, I heard an interview Tucker did with @DrPatrick and a cutting edge FDA trial they were doing in colon cancers. I didn't know Tucker well, but I had his cell phone number from the time I appeared on his Fox News program. I was embarrassed to ask for his help, but once you reach Stage Four, you pretty much have no shame. I texted and asked if perhaps he would be willing to put me in touch with someone at ImmunityBio who might review my records again. He immediately replied, "Forget that, I'm just going to call and tell them to admit you to the trial." And he did. A couple months later, I was flying out to Los Angeles for my first round of treatment with Anktiva, Dr. Patrick's cutting edge immunotherapy. We won't know for some time, of course, whether it prove to prolong or even save my life. But we do know it is the only hope we had at the darkest moment in our families' life. So despite our disagreement with many of Tucker's views these days, if I am alive in ten years, I can assure you that my husband and children will bless the fact that we knew him. So I understand that you and @ConceptualJames and @SovMichael and @DefiyantlyFree think nothing else should matter when their mob wants a struggle session and demands denoucements, but I have explained in the past you why I am not going to oblige you. And I'm not going to oblige now either.
    Mikale Olson @realmikolson
    Megan Basham has a predictable routine: Make a claim, demand evidence, dismiss the evidence when it’s provided, move the goalposts, and then somehow turn herself into the victim when she’s called out. Rinse and repeat. Yesterday was a textbook example, for instance. Megan challenged me to produce evidence of her endorsing post-liberalism. So I did — I showed her publicly “strongly recommending” American Reformer, a leading post-liberal/“Christian Nationalist” publication, and “highly recommending” Claremont, a foremost post-liberal think tank as it stands today (and there’s far more where these came from). Her response? Exactly what you’d expect. Rather than doing what an honest person would do by seriously grapple with the evidence, she shifted the argument, rationalized her original position, and acted as though the criticism/evidence was somehow unfair. You can read the exchange linked below this tweet. And here’s the problem: This isn’t about guilt by association. It’s about a repeated pattern of publicly promoting, defending, and running interference for influential figures and institutions aggressively advancing the post-liberal political project. She claims she’s not a post-liberal, yet supports their think tanks, publications, and chief evangelists. Megan wants all the credibility that comes with recommending these people and institutions without accepting any accountability for what she’s helping legitimize. You don’t get to have it both ways. And I fully expect her response to this will be more of the same: More deflection, more moving the goalposts, and more playing the victim by calling me a “Soviet” or a “Maoist” again for the 50th time instead of actually addressing the substance. At some point, the question isn’t whether @megbasham understands the criticism. She’s smart. She does. She knows what she’s doing. It’s whether she’s willing to answer for it. So far she’s shown herself, the more words pour past her forked tongue, to be a liar.
    402588262.5K
  17. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    I thought it might be helpful to illustrate who @realmikolson is by demonstrating that he ALSO feels that @conservmillen of all people has not sufficiently proven that SHE stands against the dissident right. Allie Beth Stuckey of all people. That's why I say these people are engaging in a purity spiral and witch hunts. You shouldn't follow them.
    Download
    1051846.5K
  18. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @JoelWBerry: Hey @realmikolson it’s not helpful to attack Megan. She’s one of the good guys. I know her. There are some genuinely evil snakes in the grass infiltrating the Right, she’s not one of them. Try to allow for the complications that come from interpersonal relationships. Save your ammo for the bad guys.
    Megan Basham @megbasham
    I said that I had not seen my friend @seanmdav defend Tucker since Tucker's views diverted from my own. I have zero problem saying I disagree with my friend Sean here (see how we can have different views yet refrain from accusing each other of being an "op"? That is something that comes from Lindsey and Michael O'Fallon and those who cultishly believe everything they say. Just because people disagree does not mean its an "op"). I HAVE spoken about my disagreements with Tucker's current trajectory a number of times. I have also shared why I am not going to condemn Tucker. And I have tried to help confused onlookers understand why so many in conservative media have been deeply torn about Tucker because of his past great kindnesses to so many. So here is my story. When I found out I my cancer had been upgraded to Stage Four, you can imagine how desperate and scared I was. I had been told that none of the immunotherapies that have been developed for CRC apply to me. I would have to depend on the same old chemo regimen that has left so many people in my situation dead within a few years. Out of desperation, I submitted my records for the @ImmunityBio trial. Twice. But I heard nothing back. At about my lowest and most fearful point, I heard an interview Tucker did with @DrPatrick and a cutting edge FDA trial they were doing in colon cancers. I didn't know Tucker well, but I had his cell phone number from the time I appeared on his Fox News program. I was embarrassed to ask for his help, but once you reach Stage Four, you pretty much have no shame. I texted and asked if perhaps he would be willing to put me in touch with someone at ImmunityBio who might review my records again. He immediately replied, "Forget that, I'm just going to call and tell them to admit you to the trial." And he did. A couple months later, I was flying out to Los Angeles for my first round of treatment with Anktiva, Dr. Patrick's cutting edge immunotherapy. We won't know for some time, of course, whether it prove to prolong or even save my life. But we do know it is the only hope we had at the darkest moment in our families' life. So despite our disagreement with many of Tucker's views these days, if I am alive in ten years, I can assure you that my husband and children will bless the fact that we knew him. So I understand that you and @ConceptualJames and @SovMichael and @DefiyantlyFree think nothing else should matter when their mob wants a struggle session and demands denoucements, but I have explained in the past you why I am not going to oblige you. And I'm not going to oblige now either.
    0170502
  19. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @LarryTaunton: CONSERVATIVE VS “CONSERVATIVE”:🧵 When I posted this, I was mindful of a warning from scripture: “…false prophets will arise … to lead astray, if possible, even the elect.” (Matthew 24:14) There has been a deliberate effort to penetrate conservative circles and fracture them. Here’s how it’s done: 1. Appear to abandon your lifelong commitment to the Left/Democrats. You say you’ve been “red-pilled.” 2. You earn the trust of conservatives on a variety of issues dear to them by attacking your former lefty colleagues. 3. Conservatives, desperate for heroes, immediately platform you as an oracle of truth. That you were a lifelong leftist (and often an atheist) should make the faithful wary, but those urging caution are shouted down. Your political (not spiritual, mind you) “conversion” is all that matters. 4. Now you establish a cult of your personality. Once this is done, your followers have unwittingly shifted from the fixed point of their principles to you. It’s now easy to lead them, by degrees, to embrace anything. Moreover, they become the army who insulate you from any meaningful critique. They embody the hate that you once kept hidden, but is now in the open. 5. Now comes the coup de grâce: you turn your focus, your hate, on conservatives themselves. Your followers — by now all sail, no anchor — eagerly follow you in doing it. The fracture of the right has begun. You accuse your critics of ideological “gatekeeping” when you have, in fact, sought to make yourself the ultimate gatekeeper. Game over. This is a very old tactic predating Marxists, but revived by them. The Bolsheviks were geniuses in their use of it, and the Chinese have taken it to another level. If you’ll permit me to say so, I was the first to warn you that Tim Keller was promoting Marxism; Russell Moore is a self-serving snake; Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson are not your friends; Andrew Tate is a Muslim pig out to lure young men to that evil ideology; and Jordan Peterson Peterson, while very helpful in some respects, was not to be trusted as a Bible teacher. I took sharp criticism in every case, and in every case I was proved right. So much so, that conservative personalities now act like they knew it all along! They didn’t. Now I am warning you of a new threat. Some of you are following people who don’t share your most basic assumptions about God and all that flows from belief in Him. A few have gone further: they have made champions of unbelieving charlatans and gone full attack mode against the faithful. How could they do it? It’s like aligning yourself with Richard Dawkins in toto because he expressed some minor misgivings about the decline of Christianity. It’s foolish. But it’s what many have done. My advice, wholly biblical, is this: Make the Word of God the standard against which you measure everything. Don’t go all-in on anyone but Jesus. Test everything against scripture. I, for example, voted for Trump (three times), I’ve aggressively defended him, and I’ve been a guest at Mar-a-Lago twice, but when he platformed an unrepentant pro-abortion porn star at the RNC, I sharply criticized him. My support of Trump, of anyone, extends no further than my conscience. Scripture has given us models. In Galatians 2, Paul publicly confronts Peter when the latter’s actions served to lead the young in faith astray. If Peter wasn’t above it, I dare say no one else is. Is it gatekeeping? You’re damn right. People say that as if it’s a bad thing. Jesus is the strictest of gatekeepers. When you’re defined only by what you’re against, you inevitably forget what you’re for. And there are several personalities on this platform who hate you and your God, but have a predatory instinct for leveraging what you passionately oppose for their own wicked ends. “See to it that no one takes you captive by philosophy and empty deceit, according to human tradition, according to the elemental spirits of the world, and not according to Christ.” ~Col 2: 8
    Larry Alex Taunton @LarryTaunton
    I keep saying this and it bears repeating: Many conservatives, often Christians, are aligning themselves with people on this platform who are merely anti-woke. Being against the sexual mutilation of children or Islam or open borders is setting the bar awfully low for what constitutes a conservative. Real conservatism is rooted in a Judeo-Christian worldview. It’s rooted in the Decalogue. I want the anti-woke to join us in winning elections. But I don’t want them diluting the values of the Right. Be discerning. Be wise. And don’t hitch your ideological wagon to just any yahoo on here. Some of them are wolves in sheep’s clothing out to deceive you.
    0810501
  20. Larry Alex Taunton✓@LarryTaunton
    I keep saying this and it bears repeating: Many conservatives, often Christians, are aligning themselves with people on this platform who are merely anti-woke. Being against the sexual mutilation of children or Islam or open borders is setting the bar awfully low for what constitutes a conservative. Real conservatism is rooted in a Judeo-Christian worldview. It’s rooted in the Decalogue. I want the anti-woke to join us in winning elections. But I don’t want them diluting the values of the Right. Be discerning. Be wise. And don’t hitch your ideological wagon to just any yahoo on here. Some of them are wolves in sheep’s clothing out to deceive you.
    479466736.8K
  21. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Thanks Joel, I don't know where I fall in the friend-enemy distinction debate, but grateful for your friendship. Even when we don't agree (which isn't all that often) you're a patriot.
    Joel Berry @JoelWBerry
    Hey @realmikolson it’s not helpful to attack Megan. She’s one of the good guys. I know her. There are some genuinely evil snakes in the grass infiltrating the Right, she’s not one of them. Try to allow for the complications that come from interpersonal relationships. Save your ammo for the bad guys.
    00874.7K
  22. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    "Let’s not forget that what someone refuses to say can be just as revealing as what they openly endorse...there are two uncomfortable possibilities: Either they privately sympathize with the very ideas they refuse to condemn, or they’re too afraid of upsetting their political allies to stand on principle." This is the Maoist struggle session approach in a nutshell. Either you obey their demands to condemn, or you are ONE OF THEM!! This is how every illiberal regime throughout history has behaved.
    Mikale Olson @realmikolson
    And let’s not forget that what someone refuses to say can be just as revealing as what they openly endorse. When someone repeatedly refuses to criticize individuals with a long, well-documented history of reprehensible beliefs or behavior, that silence raises legitimate questions. At some point, there are two uncomfortable possibilities: Either they privately sympathize with the very ideas they refuse to condemn, or they’re too afraid of upsetting their political allies to stand on principle. Neither is a particularly flattering explanation. One suggests ideological agreement. The other suggests moral cowardice. And neither deserves a free pass simply because the person knows how to carefully word their public statements.
    1271605.8K
  23. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Since CT rejected @canonpress's offer to purchase them, they have gone through multiple rounds of major layoffs. You have to wonder if they cut off their nose to spite their face in rejecting Canon.
    Megan Basham @megbasham
    Yesterday, while looking into @canonpress offer to buy @CTmagazine, I discovered a grant from major abortion funder, the Hewlett foundation. When I started digging deeper, it turns out that CT has taken much more than one grant. They have taken more than $1 million from the second largest funder of Planned Parenthood in the country—an organization that massively promotes abortion and transgender ideology. Interestingly, the grant started a few months after Russell Moore‘s arrival at CT. Secular left-wing money seems to follow him wherever he goes. It is no secret that many Christians believe that Christianity Today has been compromised by leftism. But this is something even I would never have expected, especially given that, their news editor, (and soon to be editor-in-chief) @MarvinOlasky once made his name exposing the funding that Sojourners was taking from George Soros. Now, his own employer is engaging in something orders of magnitude worse. Story linked below.
    10121659K
  24. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Yesterday, while looking into @canonpress offer to buy @CTmagazine, I discovered a grant from major abortion funder, the Hewlett foundation. When I started digging deeper, it turns out that CT has taken much more than one grant. They have taken more than $1 million from the second largest funder of Planned Parenthood in the country—an organization that massively promotes abortion and transgender ideology. Interestingly, the grant started a few months after Russell Moore‘s arrival at CT. Secular left-wing money seems to follow him wherever he goes. It is no secret that many Christians believe that Christianity Today has been compromised by leftism. But this is something even I would never have expected, especially given that, their news editor, (and soon to be editor-in-chief) @MarvinOlasky once made his name exposing the funding that Sojourners was taking from George Soros. Now, his own employer is engaging in something orders of magnitude worse. Story linked below.
    Download
    1419603.4K384K
  25. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @StephenLimbaugh: I scored a documentary that recently came out called Can You Hear Me Now. Here's a clip from one of the "underscore" cues.
    060566
  26. Mikale Olson✓@realmikolson
    Megan Basham has a predictable routine: Make a claim, demand evidence, dismiss the evidence when it’s provided, move the goalposts, and then somehow turn herself into the victim when she’s called out. Rinse and repeat. Yesterday was a textbook example, for instance. Megan challenged me to produce evidence of her endorsing post-liberalism. So I did — I showed her publicly “strongly recommending” American Reformer, a leading post-liberal/“Christian Nationalist” publication, and “highly recommending” Claremont, a foremost post-liberal think tank as it stands today (and there’s far more where these came from). Her response? Exactly what you’d expect. Rather than doing what an honest person would do by seriously grapple with the evidence, she shifted the argument, rationalized her original position, and acted as though the criticism/evidence was somehow unfair. You can read the exchange linked below this tweet. And here’s the problem: This isn’t about guilt by association. It’s about a repeated pattern of publicly promoting, defending, and running interference for influential figures and institutions aggressively advancing the post-liberal political project. She claims she’s not a post-liberal, yet supports their think tanks, publications, and chief evangelists. Megan wants all the credibility that comes with recommending these people and institutions without accepting any accountability for what she’s helping legitimize. You don’t get to have it both ways. And I fully expect her response to this will be more of the same: More deflection, more moving the goalposts, and more playing the victim by calling me a “Soviet” or a “Maoist” again for the 50th time instead of actually addressing the substance. At some point, the question isn’t whether @megbasham understands the criticism. She’s smart. She does. She knows what she’s doing. It’s whether she’s willing to answer for it. So far she’s shown herself, the more words pour past her forked tongue, to be a liar.
    Download
    293035045K
  27. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Posts @megbasham
    @seanmdav Also, I have answered these questions before. But @SovMichael's new attack dog @realmikolson does not care about these posts because he is trying to create the appearance of guilt through loose associations and silence. As Maoists do.
    Download
    12663.5K
  28. Megan Basham✓@megbasham
    Megan Basham
    RT @TheRightsWriter: Note to all Christians (and anyone of goodwill): This is how believers handle disagreements with friends and others who have shown their personal decency, especially when spurred to denounce them by those who display little or none.
    Megan Basham @megbasham
    I said that I had not seen my friend @seanmdav defend Tucker since Tucker's views diverted from my own. I have zero problem saying I disagree with my friend Sean here (see how we can have different views yet refrain from accusing each other of being an "op"? That is something that comes from Lindsey and Michael O'Fallon and those who cultishly believe everything they say. Just because people disagree does not mean its an "op"). I HAVE spoken about my disagreements with Tucker's current trajectory a number of times. I have also shared why I am not going to condemn Tucker. And I have tried to help confused onlookers understand why so many in conservative media have been deeply torn about Tucker because of his past great kindnesses to so many. So here is my story. When I found out I my cancer had been upgraded to Stage Four, you can imagine how desperate and scared I was. I had been told that none of the immunotherapies that have been developed for CRC apply to me. I would have to depend on the same old chemo regimen that has left so many people in my situation dead within a few years. Out of desperation, I submitted my records for the @ImmunityBio trial. Twice. But I heard nothing back. At about my lowest and most fearful point, I heard an interview Tucker did with @DrPatrick and a cutting edge FDA trial they were doing in colon cancers. I didn't know Tucker well, but I had his cell phone number from the time I appeared on his Fox News program. I was embarrassed to ask for his help, but once you reach Stage Four, you pretty much have no shame. I texted and asked if perhaps he would be willing to put me in touch with someone at ImmunityBio who might review my records again. He immediately replied, "Forget that, I'm just going to call and tell them to admit you to the trial." And he did. A couple months later, I was flying out to Los Angeles for my first round of treatment with Anktiva, Dr. Patrick's cutting edge immunotherapy. We won't know for some time, of course, whether it prove to prolong or even save my life. But we do know it is the only hope we had at the darkest moment in our families' life. So despite our disagreement with many of Tucker's views these days, if I am alive in ten years, I can assure you that my husband and children will bless the fact that we knew him. So I understand that you and @ConceptualJames and @SovMichael and @DefiyantlyFree think nothing else should matter when their mob wants a struggle session and demands denoucements, but I have explained in the past you why I am not going to oblige you. And I'm not going to oblige now either.
    010552